Skip to content

DVAR ReflexLoop · In development

Engineering that closes the loop.

Requirements, generated code, physical testing and traceable evidence. Connected in one intelligent engineering workflow.

DVAR PinMatrix test-rig concept with a probe head, circuit board and modular acquisition hardware
PinMatrix product concept

Requirements become code.
Real hardware closes the loop.

DVAR is building ReflexLoop to connect the work that usually sits in separate tools and test benches. The ambition is shorter feedback cycles, less repetitive engineering and a clearer path from a requirement to the evidence behind it.

One connected development loop.

Follow the intended workflow from the first requirement to a reviewed engineering handover.

ReflexLoop requirements concept
Define the intentWorkflow concept

Start with the intent.

Load the product requirements, interfaces and applicable assurance objectives. Establish a versioned baseline and the acceptance criteria that the work must meet.

Evidence carried forwardRequirements baseline + review decisions

Concept requirements plates connecting to the ReflexLoop controller

Build a candidate, not a black box.

Generate proposed firmware, application code and test specifications around that baseline. Connect each change to the requirement it is meant to satisfy.

Evidence carried forwardCandidate revision + requirement links

Concept code and controller layers assembling into an engineering candidate

Check it before it reaches the board.

Run unit tests, static checks and model-in-the-loop simulation where applicable. Keep engineer-reviewed test expectations and independent checks alongside generated tests.

Evidence carried forwardSoftware checks + simulation evidence

Concept digital twin board undergoing virtual validation

Bring the code into the real world.

Compile an approved candidate and flash the device under test. Connect the build identity to its DUT, fixture map and controlled operating limits.

Evidence carried forwardBuild identity + DUT configuration

Concept compiled build travelling through a programming connection into the device under test

Let the hardware answer.

The PinMatrix rig applies a configured test programme: normal behaviour, boundaries, selected fault conditions and regression checks. Capture measurements against expected outcomes.

Evidence carried forwardTest cases + physical measurements

Concept probe matrix contacting selected points on a circuit board to measure signals

Feed the evidence back.

Failures inform proposed corrections. Repeat the relevant software, simulation and hardware checks, while linking revisions, results and unresolved issues for engineer review.

Evidence carried forwardTraceable revisions + release evidence

Concept feedback path linking a revised board to a controlled evidence record

The loop accelerates the work. Engineers own the decisions.

Acceptance criteria, safe test limits and release authority remain explicit. Requirement changes are versioned and approved, not silently rewritten to make a failing test pass.

The physical side of intelligence

Meet DVAR PinMatrix.

A configurable test-rig architecture connecting the software loop to real electrical behaviour.

Concept PinMatrix fixture with dense probes positioned over the device under test
Product concept. Fixture design is DUT-specific.

1,000+

analogue inputs and outputs
in DVAR's test-rig architecture

From pins to a connected test programme.

Map selected microcontroller, ASIC and connector interfaces through a configured probe fixture. Link stimulus, measurements and expected outcomes to the same requirements baseline.

Channel configuration, probing access, signal loading and electrical limits are defined for each device under test. Detailed rig specifications are available through a technical discussion.

Discuss your DUT

Built around the evidence that matters.

Standards-aware planning, traceability and documentation. The applicable requirements depend on the product, its risks and its intended market.

Automotive engineering

Scope functional-safety evidence against applicable ISO 26262 objectives and automotive cybersecurity work against ISO/SAE 21434. Tool confidence and assurance remain project-specific.

ISO 26262 supporting processes ↗
Medical device development

Connect software lifecycle work with applicable IEC 62304 processes and ISO 14971 risk management. Final device validation and market-specific regulatory obligations remain separate responsibilities.

IEC 62304 scope ↗
Secure product development

Support secure-development evidence, including applicable IEC 62443 objectives for industrial automation and control products. Define the threat model and assurance scope for the actual system.

IEC 62443-4-1 scope ↗
Defence programmes

Plan around programme-specific assurance, contractual requirements and information-handling rules. Human oversight, quality, safety and security stay part of the engineering process.

MOD AI assurance guidance ↗

Generated tests and documents support an assurance process; they do not, by themselves, establish certification or regulatory approval.

Your models.
Your approved environment.

Deployment choice is part of the product architecture, not an afterthought.

Concept dedicated inference servers in a controlled engineering computing environment
Private-compute concept

In-house

Customer-controlled infrastructure, scoped to your security and data-handling requirements.

Your cloud

A customer-selected hosted environment with agreed access and operational controls.

DVAR-hosted

A proposed managed route, with project boundaries and responsibilities agreed before use.

Approved enterprise providers

DVAR Intelligent System deployments using approved enterprise processing services, subject to model capability, contract and retention review.

Project data follows the approved route.

The platform is being designed around controlled model execution, rather than copying project material into public chat tools. Hosting location, tenant isolation, training permissions and retention are separate choices to agree for each deployment.

Model specialisation and fine-tuning are part of the development programme, with task-specific evaluation before use.

A living evidence trail.
Not a folder at the end.

Carry requirement relationships through code revisions, builds, test cases, results, exceptions and review decisions. Keep the reason for a change beside the evidence for it.

RequirementRevisionBuildTestEvidenceReview

Designed to fit your engineering toolchain.

Polarion and SpiraTest are integration targets. Artifact mapping, permissions and synchronisation are scoped to the tools and versions your team uses.

PolarionSpiraTestYour requirements platform

Integration roadmap, not a claim of certified or already validated vendor connectors.

DVAR Intelligent System

Explore the idea.
Ask your next question.

The DVAR Intelligent System answers questions about the workflow, test rig, traceability and deployment options. For project-specific engineering, contact the DVAR team.

Public product questions only. Do not include source code, confidential designs, patient data, credentials or export-controlled information.

Let's close the loop
on your next product.

ReflexLoop is in development. Talk to us about the platform, your test requirements and potential pilot opportunities.

info@dvar.co.uk